SORCK |
The SORCK Analysis The SORCK analysis is a method developed by Kanfer and Saslow in 1969 which provides a structure by which you can analyse the pattern of antecedent and consequent events which maintain the problem behaviour. As such, the SORCK is grounded on the operant perspective on the maintenance of behaviours. |
||
(S) Stimuli |
|||
Historical Stimuli |
Those antecedent stimuli that historically precede the target behaviour, increase the likelihood that it will occur, but do not elicit the behaviour directly; For example, a disagreement between mother and father over breakfast may increase the likelihood that the mother and child will engage in conflict later that morning. |
||
Contextual Stimuli |
Those stimuli that occur concurrently with the target behaviour and increase the likelihood of it occurring, but do not directly elicit it. For examples sitting in a lecture theatre may not directly elicit nail biting, but increases the likelihood of nail biting to occur. |
||
Immediate Stimuli |
Stimuli that occur immediately prior to the target behaviour (i.e., few minutes or less) and directly elicit its occurrence. May either be a conditioned stimulus (CS) that elicits a conditioned response (e.g. fear) or may be a discriminative stimulus that signals the availability of reinforcement or punishment. The same stimulus may serve as both a CS and discriminative stimulus on some occasions. |
||
(O) Organismic Variables |
Those variables that moderate the relationship between the antecedent stimulus and target behaviour and are characteristic of the current state of the organism. For example, illness, cognition, affect, drugs. |
||
(R) Target Behaviour |
The behaviour of interest; the subject of the analysis |
||
(C) Consequences |
|||
Immediate Consequences |
Stimuli that occur immediately after the target behaviour and alter the likelihood of its recurrence. The effects or changes in the environment produced by the target behaviour. For example, nagging by wife has the immediate consequence of husband doing his chore. |
||
Long-term or Delayed Consequences |
Changes produced by the target behaviour that are not immediate, do not directly effect the likelihood of its recurrence, but influence contextual variables that may be indirectly related to the recurrence of the behaviour. For example, fighting between siblings may produce parental attention, which reinforces the fighting (immediate consequence), and case parents to become less involved in the siblings' play on future occasions (delayed consequences). Both increases the likelihood that the siblings will fight. |
||
(K) Contingencies |
Classification of the consequences as positive/negative reinforcers/punishers |
||
SORCK Analysis Notes Stimuli 1. Historical
2. Contextual
3. Immediate
Organismic Variables
Response or Target Behaviour
Consequences 1 . Immediate
2. Long-term
Contingencies
|
|||
|
|
||
|
Please read the Copyright information.February, 1998 |
e-mail: ottmar@psy.uq.edu.auWeb design: David Neumann |